Dad72

Members
  • Content Count

    4291
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    22

Dad72 last won the day on September 8 2018

Dad72 had the most liked content!

About Dad72

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    France

Recent Profile Visitors

5123 profile views
  1. You must recreate it to continue the discussions on the new forum.
  2. It seems better that you ask your question on the new forum. Everyone has almost migrated there
  3. @Trevordev, I also think that the bounding box should have position, rotation and scale. The points make me think of a rescaling as on other software. It would take something in the middle of the bounding box (rotation arrow) that makes the rotation and the points for a resetting to the scale.
  4. Dad72

    New forum

    Yes it is obvious, just the posts of this forum would be a good thing already.
  5. Dad72

    New forum

    This new forum now belongs to Babylon. Are url is forum.babylon.com The forum is no longer hosted by others. I think that should not happen anymore. For the moment we have not lost any data.
  6. Dad72

    New forum

    I remember at the very beginning that we had this forum, I had asked why, not having our own forum rather than having it hosted, to have total control and especially to be independent. We should have changed a long time ago with the growing popularity of Babylon and not depend on a forum hosting that should have been temporary.
  7. Dad72

    New forum

    You can make a copy of your post here and copy it on the new forum eventually. For the backup, it seems that Deltakosh does not have access to the export of the backup in a .sql file which is the only method to retrieve a backup.It is a kind of file which create queries to insert enter into a database. However, I find that it is not very practical to have to search on a forum and then ask questions in another, but if we have to do with it, we must adapt to this new situation and recreate a new story about the new forum. This new forum is pretty cool, simple but very effective to use. I was reluctant at first, but it's true that the new forum has something more modern. The design is purifying and goes to the essentials. It works like facebook, the messages are instant, no need to refresh the post, it appears by magic.
  8. Dad72

    New forum

    Fine too. A kind of new page that is created. It is true that the transfer can create weird posts on the words in bold, italic, color, emoticon, block code...
  9. Dad72

    New forum

    But if you want deltakosh, I can transfer everything from this forum to others with a little bit of work.I just need the SQL file of this forum and the architecture of the new one to create new queries in order to transfer everything. But if this forum is not going to disappear, that's good too, but I also agree with what Jerome says.
  10. Dad72

    New forum

    @Deltakosh, It is possible to recover the SQL database on this forum, because in this case, we can with PHP put everything back on the new forum. It's something I'm able to do if needed.We would find all our posts on the new forum
  11. Dad72

    New forum

    It lacks things that was helpful to this new forum. Like to mark all subjects as read. What was read and not read What are the online users? The fields for creating and replying to the message are very small. The external link create problems. for example PGs do not work properly. And I have not seen everything yet, I hope that there are solutions to this forum. I was good on this forum me.
  12. Dad72

    New forum

    I'm divided. I like this forum by habit of use. But the other seems good too, but I do not know for me to pronounce with certainty. I would say that both of them are fine. It's not always easy to change one's habit. 😀
  13. Dad72

    General GUI troubles

    The ideal would be to have a border color when we not have the focus and another border color when we have the focus. input.color = "black"; // No focus input.focusedColor = "grey"; // Focused; I saw in the code of PG: thicknessColor, but I think that does not exist. I did not see this property in the documentation. Maybe it was not added and it exists in the source code ?