Jump to content
This forum will be closing down. Please move to the respective dedicated project forums.

Phaser.Physics.P2JS vs. Phaser.Physics.BOX2D


weedshaker
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

today, they released the BOX2D commercial Plugin for Phaser:

 

http://phaser.io/examples/v2/category/box2d

 

or at least came up with examples, so that somebody could start working with it. Anyways, I have been using P2JS on my ongoing development and have been pretty satisfied except that it is sometimes hard to work around issues with friction which applies on a body top but also side, so that a character will not slide on top but in return hangs on the side due to that friction, sure I found some workarounds but I was wondering if BOX2D would solve such issues better.

 

Does someone have experience with both of the physics systems and if yes, what are the pros and cons of each?

 

 

Thaks a lot!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I can't say i'm an expert on either, but I think the examples illustrate a lot of the differences. One thing I was particularly interested in was the ability to add Wheel fixtures to a physics body (you may be able to do this in P2JS, but it definitely is easier with BOX2D). Detecting continuous collision appears to be easier too.

 

Hope this helps in some way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...
  • 4 months later...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...