game.add.audio vs game.sound.add

[vmars316]

game.add.audio  vs  game.sound.add

I notice that the tutorial :
http://thoughts.amphibian.com/2015/11/hit-ground-play-sound.html
uses  game.sound.add  where as the  phaser/examples  use  game.add.audio . 
Any  pros/cons  ?
Thanks

[rcoaxil]

Field "game.add" refers to GameObjectFactory, and its function "audio" looks as following:

Phaser.GameObjectFactory.prototype = {
    //***//
    audio: function (key, volume, loop, connect) {         
        return this.game.sound.add(key, volume, loop, connect);
    },
    //***//
}

So there's precisely zero difference since both do exactly the same thing. From really pedantic standpoint, "game.sound.add" is marginally faster performing since you don't have to reference the GameObjectFactory first nor call its wrapper function - not that it's relevant, with the kind of frequency you'd call this function.

You can use whichever you find better fitting with the rest of your code.