Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'intellisense'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • HTML5 Game Coding
    • News
    • Game Showcase
    • Facebook Instant Games
    • Web Gaming Standards
    • Coding and Game Design
  • Frameworks
    • Phaser 3
    • Phaser 2
    • Pixi.js
    • Babylon.js
    • Panda 2
    • melonJS
  • General
    • General Talk
  • Business
    • Collaborations (un-paid)
    • Jobs (Hiring and Freelance)
    • Services Offered

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Website URL


Twitter


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 8 results

  1. Hello Guys, I am a rookie and trying to learn phaser3. I'm curios if there is any good intellisense, auto-complete support add-on for Atom or VC for phaser 3. Best,
  2. Hi. In v2 (community edition, as far as I've tested) you could, using webpack and the expose-loader plugin, pretty much use Phaser in a bundler environment and get full (except when a physics engine was selected, but it's not a big deal) intellisense/auto-complete in VSCode and in other editors too, I believe. You could code using ES6 and lint the whole thing without issues. It doesn't seem to be the same in v3. Importing (import Phaser from 'phaser';) doesn't seem to return the same result in v3 as it did in v2 - I can't have const game = new Phaser.game(options); - and the phase
  3. Hello everyone, Background: I have been looking around for a good engine/framework to use to build HTML5 games. Since I know Unity and am familiar with the engine (plus I know my around C# a bit) I wanted to use to create HTML5 games, however the WebGL isn't quite up to par not to mention that it doesn't work on mobile browsers. So I went ahead and switched to Construct 2, now I am quite familiar with it and have used it for a long time before the switch (in fact I started with Construct 2 and then switched to Unity for making non-HTML5 games). While Construct 2 is perfect for
  4. Hi guys! I have seen some errors: this._joints is undefined ...in the playground, lately. Is anyone interested in being told about this? My latest error happened with a playground that had a mesh.setPhysicsState call, but there was no scene.enablePhysics. I disabled the user's setPhysicsState call, then tried to reRUN. Joints error. This error seems to require a playground reload... to clear the error. 6 times in 2 days. *shrug* I'll keep investigating and report news.
  5. Hi, I've been using Phaser with Notepad++ until now but I decided to try Visual Studio with Typescript (everyone praised the IntelliSense, so I thought it would be good to test it myself). I'm a completely noob so maybe I screwed up in something pretty obvious, but the IntelliSense is not working. The strange thing is that it worked at first... but it doesn't work now. I tried with the references to the phaser files but the problem persists. Is there something I'm missing?
  6. Can somebody who is already using the TernJS plugin for vim help me configure the .tern-project file for a phaser project. I have generatated the files using yeoman phaser-official generator so my folder structure looks like this: src/ | assets/ | bower_components/ | | phaser-official/ | css/
  7. Will the Phaser Sandbox get an autocomplete feature? The snippets are useful but a real autocomplete would be an awesome time saver and miss typing corrector. I love the Sandbox and currently using it on a Samsung Chromebook(the first one made) to learn game development.
  8. Hi all. Just started playing around with Phaser and I'm seeing some strange behaviour with JavaScript intellisense in Visual Studio 2013 Express for Web. I followed all the advice I could google, and it's almost working perfectly.. but something to do with being inside or outside of a function seems to be affecting it. I am very new to JavaScript, so I might be missing something, but the following behaviour doesn't make any sense to me: (I get one level of intellisense) (but not any more than that) However, inside of a function it works perfectly... (Intellisense shows me everything) In a s
×
×
  • Create New...